Legal Opinion

Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. Copple

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 2, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case 47 — PETITION ORDINARY — No brief filed. Under the circumstances attending’ the settlement the burden was on the defendant to show'that no advantage was taken of plaintiff in its' procurement.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bennett

The appellee brings this suit against the appellant to recover damages for the loss of a leg, caused by the .gross neglect of the appellant in knowingly having defective machinery for the appellee to work with while in its employment, and of which defect the appellee did not know, and which defect caused the machinery to give way and broke the appellee’s leg. The appellee recovered four thousand five hundred dollars damages for said injury. The appellant has appealed from that judgment.

The appellant traversed the allegation of defective machinery and. negligence. It pleaded the further fact…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Life Ins. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. City of Lexington v. Motel Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  3. City of Lexington v. Motel Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  4. Perry v. M. O'Neil & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API