Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Black

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 12, 1996No. 94SC663Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Lohr

Defendant Earl S. Black appealed a trial court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Crim. P. 35(c). The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s rejection of Black’s due process and illegal sentencing claims, but held that the trial court had improperly dismissed his equal protection claim. People v. Black, 894 P.2d 767, 768-71 (Colo.App.1994). Construing Black’s equal protection challenge as an “as applied” claim, the court of appeals held that an evidentiary hearing was necessary to resolve “material questions of fact which, if true, could provide…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API