Pantano v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Maupin, J.:
In this appeal, we consider the constitutionality of NRS 51.385, which concerns admission of child-victim statements in criminal proceedings through the testimony of others. We also determine whether a child-victim’s statements to a parent regarding a sexual assault constitute testimonial hearsay under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Respondent Angelo Pantano digitally penetrated his seven-year-old female cousin, D.D., while visiting at her home in Las…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Higgs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Harkins v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Rodriguez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Lamb v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.