Legal Opinion

Pantano v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2006No. 43426PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

In this appeal, we consider the constitutionality of NRS 51.385, which concerns admission of child-victim statements in criminal proceedings through the testimony of others. We also determine whether a child-victim’s statements to a parent regarding a sexual assault constitute testimonial hearsay under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Respondent Angelo Pantano digitally penetrated his seven-year-old female cousin, D.D., while visiting at her home in Las…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Higgs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Harkins v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Rodriguez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Lamb v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API