Legal Opinion
Finch v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 2008No. 04 Civ. 4434 (SAS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Barbara Finch brings this suit under section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code, claiming damages for due process violations committed by the defendants in not placing her grandchild, Manny Moe, into her custody and restricting her visitation rights to Manny. Talbot Perkins Children’s Services (“Talbot Perkins”) and its employees move for summary judgment on all of the claims pending against them. For the reasons given below, that motion is granted as to all claims arising from restricted visitation and for…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Komondy v. GiocoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- P.A. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Drawbridge v. Schenectady County Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Luck v. Westchester Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Sykes v. New York State Office of Children and Family ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.