Legal Opinion

Fauler v. Chicago, Burlington Quincy Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1934No. 30,028PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On an order to show cause why a peremptory write of mandannis should not issue directing the district court of Todd county to change the venue in the above entitled cause to Ramsey county and cause the files to be transmitted to the clerk of court of last named county, it appears from the return:

That plaintiff resides in Ramsey county, that the defendant railway company has its principal place of business in Ramsey county, and that its . railroad does not extend into Todd county, where defendant Feekler resides; that plaintiff brought this action in Ramsey county; that after the summons was…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Austin Mutual Insurance v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API