Legal Opinion

Harris v. Roberts

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 31, 1989No. C-88-0775 SAWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEIGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues under the eighth amendment of the United States Constitution, claiming: 1) deliberate indifference by prison officials to threats of harm to plaintiff; 2) deliberate indifference to plaintiff's medical needs; and 3) errors in plaintiffs prisoner classification status. On April 13, 1989 the Court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first claim as to defendants Weishardt and Kline; however, the Court dismissed this claim with prejudice as to Warden Roberts. The Court also dismissed with leave to amend plaintiff’s claims for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Gillespie v. CivilettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Keith A. Berg v. Larry KincheloeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (PC) King v. BiterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. Sammy Lee Morris v. E. BurrkhouseDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API