Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Worthington

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1866PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Ohieot Circuit Court. Hon. W. M. HaRRIsoN, Circuit Judge. We submit the following propositions: Statutes of limitations admit of an equitable as well as legal construction. Smith’s Com., 710, 814 et seg.] 18 Wend., 131. They are regarded as statutes of repose and presuppose a state of peace and access to'legally constituted tribunals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Ohieot Circuit Court. Hon. W. M. HaRRIsoN, Circuit Judge. We submit the following propositions: Statutes of limitations admit of an equitable as well as legal construction. Smith’s Com., 710, 814 et seg.] 18 Wend., 131. They are regarded as statutes of repose and presuppose a state of peace and access to'legally constituted tribunals. Angelí on Lim. 9 et seg.\ 5 Peters, 470; 1 Peters, 360. In times of war and civil tumult when the. courts are closed, our civil rights are merely held in abeyance without injury till the return of law and good government: et silei leges inter arma. 2…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice ComptoN

This was an action of assumpsit brought, in the circuit court of Chicot county, by Caleb P. Bennett as administrator of the estate of John H. Steed, deceased, against Elisha Worthington, on two promissory notes, due and payable, the one, on the 22d day of March, 1860, and the other on the 21st day of January, 1861. The defendant pleaded the statute of limitations, and the plaintiff replied' that, after the accrual of the cause of action, to-wit: from October, 1861, to October, 1865, the said circuit court of Chicot county was closed, in consequence of the existence of the late civil war, so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Otis v. WalterSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  2. Sacia v. De Graaf.New York Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Colorado & N. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Morgan v. City of Des MoinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  3. PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Murray v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. Press v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API