Cueto v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Corrected Opinion
EMAS, J.
We deny the State’s motion for rehearing. On our own motion, however, we withdraw our previous opinion and substitute the following:
Defendant Jorge Cueto appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief. We reverse, holding that the trial court erred in summarily denying Cueto’s motion without an evidentiary hearing, and in applying the incorrect standard in assessing the claims raised in Cueto’s motion.
Cueto filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, based upon a claim that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Black v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Errico v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Kyle A. Keys v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019