Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Crosby
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 2016No. 2014-1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., 149 Ohio St.3d 512, 2016-Ohio-5796, 76 N.E.3d 1089, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, 149 Ohio St.3d 282, 2016-Ohio-5793, 74 N.E.3d 427, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination regarding compliance with the 2006 version of the Dormant Mineral Act.
O'Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Walker v. Shondrick-Nau (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jefferis Real Estate Oil & Gas Holdings, LLC v. Schaffner Law Offices, L.P., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Belmont County2018
- West v. BodeOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Jeffco Resources, Inc. v. AbrechtOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Jefferis Real Estate Oil & Gas Holdings, L.L.C. v. Schaffner Law Offices, L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Whaley v. Schaffner Law Offices, L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.