Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 23, 1962No. 20,020PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton

Plaintiffs in error seek to dismiss their writ of error *448without prejudice and with directions to the trial court for further proceedings subject to its discretionary powers under R.C.P. Rule 54 (b).

The reason for the request, which defendants in error object to, is because this court heretofore on April 12, 1962, did dismiss a companion action (No. 20,005) because no final judgment had been decreed therein.

Rule 54 (b) allows a trial court to direct entry of a final judgment upon one or more but less than all of the claims on certain conditions where more than one claim exists.

In the instant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vandy's, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Broadway Roofing and Supply, Inc. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Berry v. Westknit Originals, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Young Ex Rel. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Levine v. Empire Savings and Loan AssociationColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Judd Construction Co. v. Evans Joint VentureColorado Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API