Martin v. Martin
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.
In an action for absolute divorce, instituted by order permitting service of the summons by publication, plaintiff seeks to enter judgment by default against the defendant based upon the latter’s failure to appear herein. The published summons did not contain the critical words “Action for a divorce,” required by statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1167; Buies Civ. Prac., rule 47).
Section 1167 of the Civil Practice Act specifically provides that absent such words in the summons in an action for divorce ‘£ a judgment shall not be rendered in favor of the plaintiff upon the defendant’s default in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matthews v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Valz v. Sheepshead Bay Bungalow Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. . SidorskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Schack v. BryanNew York Supreme Court · 1922
- Siccardi v. AjelloNew York Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Deason v. DeasonNew York Supreme Court · 1973