Legal Opinion
Kaye Scholer LLP v. Zalis
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 21, 2004No. 3D04-292PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGersten, J.
Petitioner law firm Kaye, Scholer, LLP, and attorney Manuel Kushner, Esq. (hereafter collectively referred to as “Scholer”), seek certiorari review of a trial court order denying their motion to compel discovery. We find the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law, quash the order, and remand with instructions to grant Scholer’s motion to compel production of documents from the respondents.
Respondent, Charles Zalis, and his affiliated companies (hereafter collectively referred to as “respondents”), filed a legal malpractice action against several law firms, including…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Watford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. HessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- TIG Ins. Corp. of America v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Criswell v. Best Western Int'l, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pat Bainter, as Non-Parties v. League of Women Voters of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Allstate Indem. Co. v. OserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. FoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Gkk v. CruzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Pat Bainter, as Non-Parties v. League of Women Voters of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.