Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Van Valkenburg v. Myers

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Ajjplication by William Van Valkenburg for a writ of mandamus requiring the respondent, Theodore Myers, the comptroller of the city of New York, to pay the relator’s salary weekly.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The relator is property clerk and assistant paymaster of the department of parks of the city of New York. He claims to be an employee of the city, earning wages, and therefore entitled to the benefits of the act, chapter 388 of the laws of 1890, known as “ The Weekly Payment Law,” and applies for a mandamus requiring the respondent, who is the comptroller of the city, to pay his salary weekly.

The statute in question provides, among other things, that every municipal corporation in this State shall pay weekly each and every employee the wages earned by such employee to within six days of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Smith v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Robinson v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. People Ex Rel. Sims v. Board of Fire CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. People Ex Rel. Satterlee v. . Board of PoliceNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Bliss v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Final Accounting of FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API