In Re Johnson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
This is a suit to determine the constitutionality of Article 2324 and/or the reasonableness of a court reporter’s fee for preparing a statement of facts. The City of In-gleside as appellant objected to the charges made by the court reporter (pursuant to Article 2324). A hearing was then requested by the court reporter, Martin A. Johnson, who sought to have the trial judge approve his fee as being reasonable. The City answered claiming the statute was unconstitutional and in any event, the fee charged was unreasonable. From an order by the trial judge approving the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- State v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
- Trimmier v. CarltonTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Robinson v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Edgewood Independent School District v. MenoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Texas Building Owners & Managers Ass'n v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Thompson v. City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.