Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 18, 1961No. App. No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The reasons stated by Judge Tucker in his opinion dismissing the applicant’s petition for relief under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act were correct.

In his application for leave to appeal to this Court the applicant makes two contentions which were not presented in his original petition: that is (1) that he was entitled to a transcript of the testimony taken at his trial in conjunction with his application under the U. P. C. P. A., and (2) that he was entitled to be present at the hearing on his application.

The first of the applicant’s new contentions is not properly before us. If it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plump & Kye v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Shifflett v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wimbush v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API