Legal Opinion
Farmers' Exchange Bank of Lindsay v. Cutler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 16, 1924No. 14623PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
The only question in this case is as to whether the trial court erred in sustaining the motion of defendant Addie Cutler to dissolve the attachment in this cause.
The plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, brought its action against the defendant and others in the district court of Garvin county on July 14, 1923, the basis of its cause of action being the recovery upon a promissory note in the sum of $1,500, with interest, executed by the defendant C. H. Cutler as principal:
In its second cause of action! the plaintiff alleges that the defendant C. H. Cutler is possessed of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Field v. GoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Illinois Life Ins. Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Merritt v. Park Nat. Bank of SulphurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Williams v. the Farmer's Gin and Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Allen v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Enosburg Falls Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Cooper v. KiesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Antrim Lbr. Co. v. HazelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926