Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1983No. WD 33515PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Presiding Judge.

By the verdict of a jury, appellant was found guilty of forcible rape (§ 566.030.1, RSMo Supp.1980), and punishment was assessed by it at seven years imprisonment, which was accordingly imposed by the court.

The sole issue is whether the trial court should have included in the verdict-directing instruction this paragraph of MAI-CR 2d 20.02.1: “Fourth, that the defendant did not believe that [name of victim ] consented to the intercourse, as submitted in Instruction No. _”, and whether the court should have given an instruction under MAI-CR 2d 2.37.1.2 on appellant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GullettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BadakhsanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State v. BarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. NuttMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. NuttMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API