Legal Opinion

Slocum v. Daigre

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1987No. 85-66Published

1Opinion of the Court

WARREN E. HOOD, Judge Pro Tem.

This suit is a sequel to Collins v. Slocum, 317 So.2d 672 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1975). In that previous suit, the plaintiffs, Gwin LeBlanc, J.W. Slocum, Jr. and Harry Henderson, III, (LSH) unsuccessfully sought damages from their attorney for his failure to note in his title opinion the existence of a pipeline servitude across a tract of property they subsequently purchased.

In this suit the plaintiffs, LeBlanc, Henderson and A. Jerry Slocum, the son of J.W. Slocum, Jr., who purchased his father’s interest in the property, now seek to recover damages from the estate of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. SlocumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Patin v. State Farm Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Collins v. SlocumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API