Legal Opinion

State v. Hurchalla

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 15, 1994No. 32426-8-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

After a jury trial, Robert Hurchalla was convicted of second degree assault with a deadly weapon and of a deadly weapon enhancement. He appeals, contending that the trial court erroneously refused to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of unlawful display of a firearm. We conclude that, under State v. Davis, 121 Wn.2d 1, 846 P.2d 527 (1993), unlawful display of a firearm cannot be a lesser included offense of second degree assault with a deadly weapon, and that the trial court properly refused the proposed instruction.

I — t

Facts

One evening after work, Nick Corniel stopped at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Fernandez-MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. LuckyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. LuckyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. McJimpsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. State v. McJimpsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API