State v. Hurchalla
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
After a jury trial, Robert Hurchalla was convicted of second degree assault with a deadly weapon and of a deadly weapon enhancement. He appeals, contending that the trial court erroneously refused to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of unlawful display of a firearm. We conclude that, under State v. Davis, 121 Wn.2d 1, 846 P.2d 527 (1993), unlawful display of a firearm cannot be a lesser included offense of second degree assault with a deadly weapon, and that the trial court properly refused the proposed instruction.
I — t
Facts
One evening after work, Nick Corniel stopped at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Fernandez-MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LuckyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LuckyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. McJimpsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. McJimpsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.