Shoemaker v. Huffnagle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
THIS case came before this Court by certificate of error to the court of Nisi Prius of Philadelphia county, held before Judge Kennedy, where a nonsuit was entered on motion. It was an ejectment brought by Lewis Shoemaker against John Huffnagle and eighteen others, to recover a large lot of ground at .the south-west corner of Mulberry and Ninth streets, in the city of Philadelphia, containing 80 feet in front on Mulberry street, and running back 307 feet to Filbert street.
Read the full summary
THIS case came before this Court by certificate of error to the court of Nisi Prius of Philadelphia county, held before Judge Kennedy, where a nonsuit was entered on motion. It was an ejectment brought by Lewis Shoemaker against John Huffnagle and eighteen others, to recover a large lot of ground at .the south-west corner of Mulberry and Ninth streets, in the city of Philadelphia, containing 80 feet in front on Mulberry street, and running back 307 feet to Filbert street. Before the trial, the death of Lewis Shoemaker was suggested, and Deborah E. Shoemaker, his only child, was substituted.…
1Per curiam
— The court being satisfied with the opinion of the judge before whom the cause was tried, as also the reasoning contained in it, do therefore approve and adopt it. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Yarnall's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872