Legal Opinion
19 W. 36th Holding Corp. v. Parker
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided August 9, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter M. Wendt, J.
Petitioner commenced the instant nonpayment proceeding by service of notice of petition and petition on or about March 26, 2002 to recover the subject premises. The petition stated that the subject apartment is exempt from rent regulation because the maximum legal rent on or after April 1, 1994 was more than $2,000 per month and the apartment became vacant and was rerented after April 1, 1994, and after the monthly *520legal rent had reached $2,000. Respondent filed a pro se answer on or about April 8, 2002, alleging improper service of the pleadings and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Johnson v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Nicholas Di Menna & Sons, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Missry v. EhlichCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
- Bennett v. Hawthorne VillageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Meserole A-B 81-93 Equities Corp. v. RussoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2020