Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kmart Corp. v. Frantom

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1999No. 97-1655PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Kmart Corporation (“Kmart”), moved appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio (“commission”) for permission to depose a specialist who had pronounced former Kmart employee appellee Virginia Frantom permanently and totally disabled from her work-induced injury. The commission denied Kmart’s motion, and Kmart requested a writ of mandamus to overturn that decision before the commission could either grant or deny Frantom’s application for permanent and total disability compensation. The Court of Appeals for *431Franklin County denied the writ, holding that mandamus is not available to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sobczav. SkowOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Williams v. Moody's of Dayton, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State ex rel. McKim v. Hobart Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. D'AMBROSIO v. BagleyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. State Ex Rel. Groff v. Indus. Commiss., 08ap-697 (4-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API