Legal Opinion

Winkler v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 23, 2016No. Appellate Case 2014-000904; Opinion 27685PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE FEW:

This is a post-conviction relief (PCR) action arising out of Louis Michael Winkler, Jr.’s murder conviction and death sentence. We reverse the PCR court’s ruling that trial counsel was ineffective in the sentencing phase of Winkler’s trial for not objecting when the trial court did not answer the jury’s questions about the consequences of a failure to reach a unanimous verdict. We also reverse the PCR court’s denial of Winkler’s pretrial motions in the PCR action in which he requested additional time to obtain and analyze evidence related to his alleged brain damage. Because the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mangal v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
  3. State v. Jerome Jenkins Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. Xzariera O. GrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API