Lane v. Ball
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Calvin U. Gantenbein, Judge. This is an action by Adolphus Lane against W. F. Ball, E. E. Farrington, C. H. Farrington, C. M. White and John B. Coffey. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals. Department 1. Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
Read the full summary
From Multnomah: Calvin U. Gantenbein, Judge. This is an action by Adolphus Lane against W. F. Ball, E. E. Farrington, C. H. Farrington, C. M. White and John B. Coffey. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals. Department 1. Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Moore. The complaint in this action was filed February 23, 1915, and alleges in effect that the defendants E. E. Farrington, C. H. Farrington and C. M. White are and at all the times stated were attorneys at law and engaged in the practice of their profession at Portland, Oregon, and are financially interested in a judgment…
1Opinion
Former opinion reversed and judgment affirmed March 27, 1917.
On Rehearing.
(163 Pac. 975.)
The opinion heretofore rendered in this cause set aside and judgment below affirmed. Affirmed.
Mr. C. M. White, for respondents.
Mr. Allan B. Joy and Messrs. Logan & Smith, for appellant.
In Banc.
2Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
A rehearing herein having been granted it was maintained that if the averments of the complaint be construed as stating facts constituting an abuse of process, the right to the relief sought arose when the plaintiff was imprisoned, and as the action was not commenced within two years from that time the statute of…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Malone v. BelcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Antcliff v. JuneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Dishaw v. WadleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Cardival v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Zinn v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.