Legal Opinion
Century Federal, Inc. v. City of Palo Alto, Cal.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 1, 1987No. C-85-2168 EFLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LYNCH, District Judge.
The Court has already published two opinions in this case that set forth in great detail the facts surrounding this plaintiff’s challenge to defendants’ (hereinafter “the Cities”) cable television (hereinafter “CTV”) franchising and regulatory scheme. See Century Federal, Inc. v. City of Palo Alto, 648 F.Supp. 1465 (N.D.Cal.1986) (“Century Federal II”); Century Federal, Inc. v. City of Palo Alto, 579 F.Supp. 1553 (N.D.Cal.1984). At the conclusion of the Century Federal II opinion, the Court stated that the Cities did not “necessarily have to open their cable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Telesat Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Riviera BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993