Biscayne Kennel Club, Inc. v. Board of Business Regulation
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentSpector, Judge
I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the court’s majority.
The conclusion of the court that the order of the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering and subsequent order of the Board of Business Regulation are reviewable by petition for certiorari is contrary to the holding of the Florida Supreme Court in West Flagler Amusement Company, Inc. v. State Racing Commission et al., 122 Fla. 227, 165 So. 64 (1935). That case was a certiorari proceeding seeking to have quashed an order of the State Racing Commission relating to the apportionment of dog racing dates in Dade County between Flagler,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- West Flagler Amusement Co. v. State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- State Ex Rel. West Flagler Amusement Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Biscayne Kennel Club, Inc. v. Florida State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- STATE EX REL. GULFSTREAM PARK RACING ASS'N, INC. v. Florida State Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- State ex rel. Investment Corp. v. Board of Business RegulationSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.