M.W. v. SPCP Group V, LLC
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurrence
EMAS, J.,
specially concurring.
I concur in the result because I believe it to be dictated by this court’s prior decision in Apple Premium Finance Serv. Co. v. Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass’n of Am., 727 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Were we writing on a clean slate however, it might well be appropriate to consider whether the notice requirement of - rule 1.500(b) is properly triggered by a single pre-suit letter sent five' months before the commencement of the action.
The plain language of rule 1.500(a) and (b) provides that a party may seek a clerk’s default unless the party against whom…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gulf Maintenance & Supply, Inc. v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Ole, Inc. v. YarivDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Jar, Inc. v. Universal American RealtyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- EGF Tampa Associates v. BohlenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.