Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Comstock

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Stevens county, Brown, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

Defendant made his promissory note to Johnson, by whom it was before maturity indorsed to Wilcox, who in his turn indorsed it to plaintiff, by whom the action is brought upon it. Upon the theory that the note fell due while in Wilcox’s hands, and before its indorsement to plaintiff, defendant undertakes to defeat this action by setting up a claim against Wilcox, as follows: He alleges a for-

mer partnership between himself and Wilcox, which was dissolved long before the commencement of this action, but whose affairs have never been wound up, — there having been no settlement or accounting in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waddell v. . DarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lambertson v. WestermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Little v. SimondsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Apelt v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API