Clarence J. Sapp and Hilda C. Sapp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This petition for review raises the question whether the Tax Court decision was clearly erroneous in finding that a portion of the automobile expense, including an allowance for -depreciation, claimed by the taxpayer as a deduction, was personal in nature and not deductible, where, in addition to using it in his medical practice, the taxpayer used the automobile to “commute” to work, to go home for lunch, and to attend social functions.
The facts are adequately set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court reported at 36 T.C. 852. We conclude also that the reasoning and decision of the Tax Court…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sapp v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
3Cited by42 opinions
- William W. Steinhort and Mildred Steinhort v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- International Artists, Ltd. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- Sheldon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. William A. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- D'Angelo Assoc., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.