Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bockweg v. Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1993No. 7PA92Published

1DissentJustice Meyer

I agree with the majority that the denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on res judicata is immediately appealable. However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the doctrine of res judicata does not bar plaintiffs’ action in this case.

I believe that only one claim exists in this case for one course of medical treatment. This claim is based on a single core of operative facts and on two tightly intertwined theories of medical negligence: (1) negligence in the diagnosis and treatment of plaintiff Cynthia Bockweg’s pelvic infection, and (2) failure to monitor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Harnett v. BillmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. 38 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1685, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,604 Silas J. Alexander v. Chicago Park DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API