Legal Opinion

Thibodeaux v. Jurgelsky

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 2004No. CA 2003-1298PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

li WOOD ARP, Judge.

Ms. Brenda Thibodeaux and her husband, Lucien (Gerard), appeal a trial court judgment which found that her OB/GYN, Dr. Debbie Jurgelsky, did not deviate from the proper standard of care when she performed a total abdominal hysterectomy during a dilation and curettage (D & C) procedure and more specifically, that Dr. Jurgelsky had consent to perform the hysterectomy. For the following reasons, we reverse.

[[Image here]]

Dr; Jurgelsky had been Brenda’s treating OB/GYN since 1991, when Brenda was pregnant with her second child. She delivered the baby by cesarean section…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Reck v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Wainwright v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thibodeaux v. JurgelskySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API