Legal Opinion
Public Citizen v. Kantor
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 5, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-1148PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.
Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief requiring the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) and the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“OTR”) to prepare an Environmental Impact Study (“EIS”) for the Uruguay Round (“Uruguay Round”) of the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (“GATT”). 1 In addition, plaintiffs seek to require adoption by the OTR of “methods and procedures” to insure future compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”). 42…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dalton v. SpecterSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Washington Legal Foundation v. United States Sentencing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Energy Policy Development GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Chamber of Commerce v. ReichDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.