Legal Opinion

APPEAL OF MacKENZIE AUTO EQUIPMENT CO.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1951No. 7636PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

This action involves a controversy between the Employment Security Fund, or Agency, provided for under the Employment Security Law, 1947 S.L. c. 269, page 793, and appellant MacKenzie Auto Equipment Co., as to the rate of contribution or tax appellant should be required to pay to the Fund on its payroll to employees, subsequent to January 2,1945.

The facts are: F. E. MacKenzie, as an individual, over a period of years, was an employer operating auto equipment stores in Southern Idaho. One of these stores or employing units was located in Pocatello, and one in Idaho Falls. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Packard Clothes Inc. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Ned's Auto Supply Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Schwob Manufacturing Company v. HuietCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. El Queeno Distributing Co. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. State v. Dallas Liquor Warehouse No. 4Texas Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens Suburban Co. v. Rosemont Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. O'BRYANT v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Super Grade, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Commerce & LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Sirloin Saloon of Shelburne, Rutland, & Manchester, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. E. B. Jones Motor Co. v. Industrial Commission of Missouri, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API