Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. L&S Sons, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 17, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated September 4, 2001, as granted those branches of the motion of the defendants L&S Sons, Inc., and Lloyd Newman, which were to vacate the default of the defendant L&S Sons, Inc., in answering the complaint and to compel the plaintiff to accept its untimely answer, and denied his cross motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant L&S Sons, Inc.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- FID. & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Leogrande v. GlassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Anamdi v. AnugoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Lindo v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Santos v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Falla v. Keel Holdings, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Specialized Risk Management, Inc. v. Cri-Bet Realty, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Pantaleon v. OgilivieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005