People v. Peyton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly determined that the photo array identification procedure used by the investigating officer was not unduly suggestive (see, People v James, 185 AD2d 702, lv denied 80 NY2d 930). We conclude that the court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss *977the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30. The People announced their readiness for trial within the statutory period, and all periods of post-readiness delay were attributable to defendant’s request for new counsel and defendant’s pretrial motions.
The court did not err in denying…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. ScarboroughNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SuarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. RickettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998