Legal Opinion

People v. Peyton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly determined that the photo array identification procedure used by the investigating officer was not unduly suggestive (see, People v James, 185 AD2d 702, lv denied 80 NY2d 930). We conclude that the court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss *977the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30. The People announced their readiness for trial within the statutory period, and all periods of post-readiness delay were attributable to defendant’s request for new counsel and defendant’s pretrial motions.

The court did not err in denying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. ScarboroughNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. SuarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RickettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API