State Ready Mix, Inc. v. Moffatt & Nichol
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Mixing concrete, like baking a cake, is fraught with problems when the recipe is not followed. Here, concrete supplier, State Ready Mix, Inc. (State), wrote the concrete mix design (the recipe) and prepared a bad batch of concrete that was used to construct a harbor pier. State blames the bad concrete on the civil engineer who drafted the pier plans and helped the general contractor by gratuitously reviewing State’s concrete mix design. In the words of Clare Boothe Luce, “No good deed goes unpunished.” (See Wright v. Beverly Fabrics, Inc. (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 346, 348 [115…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lichtman v. Siemens Indus. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- BMA LLC v. HDR Global Trading LimitedDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Lichtman v. Siemens Industry Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Luzuriaga v. R.C. Berger Construction CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Moriarty v. American General Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.