Newman v. E. E. Overholtzer Sons' Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
—Plaintiffs recovered damages for personal injuries to Anna Newman and for injuries to a Ford automobile belonging to plaintiffs, resulting from a collision between the defendant’s ambulance and plaintiffs’ automobile at the intersection of 25th and Main Streets, Los Angeles. Main Street is sixty-nine feet between curbs at the intersection. The ambulance was empty until after the accident and was not answering a call. It was a long, heavy machine, having a 149-inch wheel base and weighing four thousand five hundred pounds. It was traveling in a northerly direction at a high rate of speed,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bennett v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Olden v. Babicora Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Offerdahl v. Motor Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Ex Parte HallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.