Legal Opinion

Newman v. E. E. Overholtzer Sons' Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1920No. L. A. No. 6037PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

—Plaintiffs recovered damages for personal injuries to Anna Newman and for injuries to a Ford automobile belonging to plaintiffs, resulting from a collision between the defendant’s ambulance and plaintiffs’ automobile at the intersection of 25th and Main Streets, Los Angeles. Main Street is sixty-nine feet between curbs at the intersection. The ambulance was empty until after the accident and was not answering a call. It was a long, heavy machine, having a 149-inch wheel base and weighing four thousand five hundred pounds. It was traveling in a northerly direction at a high rate of speed,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Bennett v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Olden v. Babicora Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Offerdahl v. Motor Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Ex Parte HallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API