Legal Opinion
Coe v. Town of Blooming Grove
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 18, 2010No. 06 CIV 8149-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge. 1
The plaintiff Reverend Alexandra Coe (“Coe”) seeks attorneys’ fees and costs following an action against the defendants Town of Blooming Grove (the “Town”) and Village of Washingtonville (the “Village”) 2 for violation of her First Amendment rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. Pl.’s Sec. Mot. for Attys.’ Fees and Costs at l. 3 The Town and the Village ask the Court to deny Coe’s request for fees and costs because she is not a prevailing party, Def.’s Opp’n to Pl.’s Mot. for Attys.’ Fees and Costs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- E.S. Ex Rel. B.S. v. Katonah-Lewisboro School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Mister Sprout, Inc. v. Williams Farms Produce Sales, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Coe v. Town of Blooiming GroveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012