Legal Opinion

Martin v. Browning

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided August 2, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-106 (WOB-CJS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

William 0. Bertelsman, United States District Judge

This case presents a significant Erie question: whether a federal court must follow the rule announced by the Supreme Court of Kentucky that evidence of a defendant trucking company’s alleged negligence in hiring, training, supervision, en-trustment and retention, is admissible, even if the defendant trucking company has admitted liability for the negligence of its driver. See MV Transp., Inc. v. Allgeier, 433 S.W.3d 324 (Ky.2014).1

The facts in this case are straightforward. The truck sideswiped plaintiffs car as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Annabelle Legg v. Dr. Ash Chopra, University Urology, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grand Isle Shipyards, Inc. v. Black Elk Offshore Operations, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  2. Popp v. Sharco Express, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API