Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kromer v. Kromer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1991Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Miller, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to modify the order appealed from by deleting the provision thereof which awarded the plaintiff the principal sum of $887.43, and as so modified, to affirm the resettled judgment insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, with the following memorandum: I concur with my colleagues’ conclusion that the Supreme Court erred in interpreting the *474parties’ separation agreement so as to require the defendant to pay for the children’s unreimbursed medical expenses, since the agreement only provides for payment for the children’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Werking v. Amity Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API