Legal Opinion

United States v. Battle

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1893No. 169PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri. Application by Battle & Co., chemists, for a review of the board of general appraisers’ decision as to the classification of certain imports of chloral hydrate. The circuit court held that the goods were dutiable under paragraph 76, Schedule A, of the act of October 1, 1890. 50 Fed Kep. 402. The United States appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri. Application by Battle & Co., chemists, for a review of the board of general appraisers’ decision as to the classification of certain imports of chloral hydrate. The circuit court held that the goods were dutiable under paragraph 76, Schedule A, of the act of October 1, 1890. 50 Fed Kep. 402. The United States appeals. Statement by CALDWELL, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Missouri. The…

1Opinion of the Court

CALDWELL, Circuit Judge,

(after stating the facts.) Haying reached the same conclusions as those expressed in the opinion of Judge THAYER. in the circuit court, the judgment below is affirmed.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Battle & Co. Chemists' Corp. v. States.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1901
  2. Koechl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  3. United States v. ScheringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  4. Schering v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
  5. In re MerckU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API