Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Johnson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accor*949dance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court failed to set forth the factors it considered and the reasons for its decision, as required by statute, in distributing the separate and marital property of the parties and in awarding child support (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d], [g]; [7] [a], [b]; see generally, D’Agostino v D’Agostino, 183 AD2d 867, 868; Otto v Otto, 150 AD2d 57, 62; Norgauer v Norgauer, 126 AD2d 957, 958).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cappiello v. CappielloNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Otto v. OttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Hanford v. HanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Norgauer v. NorgauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gittelson v. GittelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Betro v. CarboneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005