Cain v. State

Miller, Judge.

A jury found Henry David Cain guilty of impersonating a peace officer. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Cain appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and arguing that the trial court coerced a unanimous verdict and prejudiced the jury by causing one juror to change his vote. We discern no error and affirm.

1. Cain contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain his conviction. On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, and Cain no longer enjoys the presumption…