Rogers v. Gould
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBxjur, J.
These motions are directed toward vacating notices to examine various defendants in a derivative action brought by plaintiffs, stockholders, on behalf of a corporation to secure an accounting from certain of its directors. The chief objection to the notice is that it does not state, as required by section 290, subdivision 4, of the Civil Practice Act, “ the issues upon which such persons are to be examined.” The notices in this respect follow generally the form of recital: “ The issue raised by paragraph first of his answer heretofore served herein wherein each and every allegation contained…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bamberger v. CookeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Richmond v. JosephthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rubin v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Standard Oil Co. v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927