Legal Opinion · Dissent

Snider v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 19, 2013No. 103,340Published

1DissentMoritz, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Snider’s failure to follow the procedural requirements for recovering appellate attorney fees bars his recovery for such fees. First, I would find that because American Family failed to raise this issue either in the trial court on remand of Snider v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., No. 101,202, 2009 WL 2902588 (Kan. App. 2009) (unpublished opinion) (Snider I), or in a cross-appeal to the Court of Appeals in Snider v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 45 Kan. App. 2d 196, 244 P.3d 1281 (2011) (Snider II), this issue was not properly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evans v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Stafford v. KarmannCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  3. Snider v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  4. Vogel v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
  5. In re the Marriage of ArndtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API