Legal Opinion · Dissent

Milwaukee Safeguard Insurance v. Selcke

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1997No. 82047Published

1DissentJustice Bilandic

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that section 409 of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/409 (West 1992)) facially violates the uniformity clause of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 (Ill. Const. 1970, art. IX, § 2). I therefore dissent.

Section 409 imposes a 2% tax on net taxable premium income collected on insurance policies written in Illinois. Domestic insurance companies, however, are not required to pay the premium tax if they meet certain exemption requirements, such as maintaining in Illinois their principal place of business; maintaining in Illinois officers and personnel…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hanover Fire Insurance v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API