Legal Opinion
Denemark v. Ed B. Mooney, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 2, 1951No. 4-9309PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The appellants herein, Mr. and Mrs. Emil Denemark, are residents of Chicago, and are partners owning a string of horses and operating a racing stable.
In the fall of 1948, they decided to bnild a stable near the race-track at Hot Springs, Arkansas, and had plans and specifications prepared by an architect in Chicago. Denemark brought these plans and specifications to Hot Springs and consulted with Mr. Joe McRae, Secretary-Treasurer and, apparently, Manager of the appellee Ed B. Mooney, Incorporated.
McRae gave Denemark an estimate of the costs of building a stable according to the plans and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Carr v. FairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Leifer Manufacturing Co. v. GrossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Chapman v. LiggettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- Mailander v. Continental State Bank of BeckvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- N. L. Wymard and George L. Stark, Receivers of Kemmel & Co., Inc., Debtor v. McCloskey & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- N. L. Wymard and George L. Stark, Receivers of Kemmel & Co., Inc., Debtor v. McCloskey & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965