Commonwealth v. Mendonca
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
Convicted after a bench trial in the Lowell District Court of two counts of violating a G. L. c. 209A protective order,1 the defendant claims the Commonwealth failed to prove *685that the protected party (Shirley) was put in fear of imminent serious physical harm as a result of telephone calls he made to her. He also argues that the Commonwealth did not prove he knew of the existence of the order, that the evidence was insufficient to show he called Shirley on a date charged, and that the jury waiver colloquy conducted by the judge was inadequate. We affirm the convictions.
1. Background. Shirley…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Board of Appeals of Hanover v. Housing Appeals Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Ciummei v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DelaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ConsoliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. Jean-PierreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. WelchMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. RezendesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Uttaro v. UttaroMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.