McMillan Book Co. v. State Division of Human Rights
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Egbert Lynch, J.
The petitioners move under article 78 of the CPLB to prohibit á public hearing before the respondent State Division of Human Eights. The respondent cross-moves, pursuant to CPLB 7804 (subd. [f]) to dismiss the petition as insufficient in law.
On January 8, 1970 the petitioners were served with a complaint brought against them to the respondent division by the respondent Geraldine V. Santy. On September 18, 1970 they were served with a notice of a public hearing on the complaint. It is this hearing which is sought to be prohibited. The petitioners argue that paragraph a of subdivision 4 of…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Randy—The Salon v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994