Legal Opinion

Valentin v. Ena

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1908PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Submission on Ac-hikicd Statement of Facts.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BALLOU, J.

From the agreed statement of facts it appears that Father IT. Valentin and the Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd., are executors and trustees under the will of John Ena, deceased, and that Maria X. Ena, widow of the said John Ena, has elected to take her dower in lien of the provision made for her in the will. The personal property in the hands of the executors consists of cash approximating $24,000; stock, bonds and other movable property appraised at $61,000; one leasehold having an unexpired term of eighty-eight years valued at $5,000; and three other leaseholds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Creecy v. . Pearce, Adm'r .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. Boynton v. SawyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  3. McCord v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. In re VidaHawaii Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In re the Estate of LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Macaulay v. SchurmannHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  4. In re Estate KaienaHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Castle v. CastleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API